Re: APRENDE A Promocionar Tu Negocio en Internet CON EXITO
Von: Franquicia FFI (lamedina@gmail.com) [Profil]
Datum: 24.01.2008 02:20
Message-ID: <89d5d4f5%9d3b_8b39-97ff$cdc45b244c8a@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: es.ciencia.marketingrec.music.christian
Datum: 24.01.2008 02:20
Message-ID: <89d5d4f5%9d3b_8b39-97ff$cdc45b244c8a@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: es.ciencia.marketingrec.music.christian
came into operation, with the following additional powers in the hands of the "Protector" of Chinese, the Registrar General: 1st, Not only were keepers of unregistered houses to be fined or sent to prison, but the women--"held in practical slavery for the purposes of prostitution"--when found in unregistered houses were also subject to fine and imprisonment. 2nd, The Registrar-General, otherwise the "Protector" of Chinese, could break into any house suspected of being a brothel, and arrest the keeper thereof without warrant. And he could authorize his underlings to do the same. 3rd, The Registrar General could exercise both judicial and executive powers in the prosecution of the duties of his office. 4th, All outdoor prostitutes could be arrested without warrant, fined and imprisoned. The new law possessed one virtue over the old. It frankly, and more honestly, employed the word "licensed," where the old law said "registered," brothels. The report of the Commission says: "Although the new Ordinance conferred such extensive and unusual powers on the Registrar General and Superintendent of Police as to breaking into and entering houses and arresting keepers without warrant, no serious difficulty whatever, so far as the records show,--and we have paid special attention to the point,--seems to have been experienced under the previous enactments in bringing the keepers of such houses before the court.... Nor can we in the second place find among the foregoing records proof of the necessity of the transfer to the Registrar General of the judicial powers.... As a matter of fact, witnesses do not seem to have been at all squeamish in divulging repulsive details in open Court, no[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
